Latest Issue

Media Appetite for Ocean Destruction Damaging Science

Western Australia Perth with a strong Ocean culture and Coastal Development 
Are you sick of reading about islands of plastic floating in the ocean? Sick of reading about coral destruction and invasive species? Sick of panic ocean reports? Do you still believe that the oceans are an unexplored frontier which offer more benefits than drawbacks? Are you skeptic on just how bad the oceans are and believe that there is still much wild untouched out there and hope for the wide blues? If you are one of these guys then you are not only not alone but now have scientific papers that support your way of thinking. 

Carlos Duarte, a marine biologist at the University of Western Australia in Perth, and his colleagues broke international headlines with a new paper which concluded that  the “Ocean Calamities are Oversold!”.

Using controversy communication the team urges for more scepticism in marine research and presses the international media for more balanced reporting. Duarte believes that ocean science deserves more respect and therefore more research before reaching or jumping to conclusions. Duarte and his team analyzed recent breaking news on “Ocean Calamities” and concluded that most are unfounded. 

“The media has an appetite for ocean destruction reports, and gloomy stories” Duarte and his colleagues stated. 

On January 14th Nature reported that the “state of the world's seas is often painted as verging on catastrophe...but although some challenges are very real, others have been vastly overstated”. 

Duarte and his colleagues after study concluded that scientists, journals and the media have fallen into a “mode of groupthink that can damage the credibility of the ocean sciences”. Unweaving and breaking down ocean story after ocean story breaking in the international massive media Duarte presented a full scientific report which focuses on the “communication fault lines which now exist in the marine-science community”.     

Duarte report is not a minor paper of irrelevant value.. Scientific information and reports are the base foundations which international world leaders and decision makers utilize when taking final decisions. These decisions are also not minor, climate change, marine traffic, economics, global carbon emissions, fishery, development, conservation, marine protection, development, natural disasters, health, environmental and ecological services, these are just some of the many sectors which are affected daily by decision makers. Decisions makers -which rarely are “on the ground” or in this case “on the shores” or out in the ocean waters use what they have at hand to shape directions which have regional and sometimes global repercussions. Scientific reports and breaking international mass communication media are tools are of utter importance in this sense. 

On the other hand, scientific ocean science -just now starting to scratch the surface of a unlimited realm demands international standards of the highest levels for its continual formation. In this sense, science per science is value enough. Finally considering the general public high standards of communications is what the final reader usually expects.  


Wild theories, unbiased reports, fast jumped conclusions these are manifestations which rise from global communities when confronted with issues which are generally beyond comprehension. The unknown, the unexplored, the mysterious becomes material for the imagination and human imagination when set loose into the unknown has a tendency to the dark side. 

Ocean Service NOAA responds the question; How much of the ocean have we explored? ”To date, we have explored less than five percent of the ocean!” NOAA concludes.  

Historical proof of these ocean imagination manifestations used to depict fears of the the unknown are scared into our society. Ancient maps with giant turtles or elephants holding the end of a flat world, massive marine ocean creatures which swallow vessels, legends of mysterious creatures roaming the oceans, songs of the ancient sailors which today have evolved. Today the mysteries are others, the frontiers are different, the explored realms have been pushed. Media reports on mysterious islands of global garbage that float in the oceans, new strange species -monsters of the depths, islands being formed from nowhere to later disappear, entire archaeological mystical cities submerged, massive extinction of ocean species, and so on.  

Duarte recognizes the importance of climate change and also the importance of fishery impacts but frowns and grims when confronted with “Gloomy media reports about ocean issues such as invasive species and coral die-offs”. These are according to Duarte “not always based on actual observations”. 

“It is not just journalists who are to blame,: the marine research community may not have remained sufficiently sceptical on the topic,” Duarte searches for allies in diverse sectors. 

Whether Duarte’s paper is correct or completely unfounded is an issue which requires further investigation however the core philosophy behind the report, the central issue of scepticism is the main column of science itself. Science concludes upon evidence. 

The Duarte team dared to enter the “Established Climate Change Lion Cage” to confront it to the face. Climate change is taken for granted today globally. Putting the issue on the doubt table forces us to find evidence and new proof. This forces us to research, rethink issues, think creatively, and above all think by ourselves, to always have doubts and new questions. Questioning everything in science is the best way to go. 

Among the "excessive media headlines" Duarte cited CNN, Nature, New York Times, and other communication giants. 

The paper of Duarte was published on December 31st in BioScience. Duarte and his team looked into overfishing, jellyfish blooms, invasive species and the impact of ocean acidification on organisms such as corals. 

“The appetite of the media for particular headlines can influence the contents of top scientific journals,” Duarte ends it.